From Josh.Mullis at cox.com Thu Nov 6 17:21:52 2008 From: Josh.Mullis at cox.com (Josh.Mullis at cox.com) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:21:52 -0500 Subject: [dsc] Second Level Domains Message-ID: Good day, Is there any way to graph Second Level Domains (google.com, facbook.com, etc...) as opposed to Top Level Domains (.com, .org, etc...)? I see Second Level Domains in the xml's, but can't find a way to get it graphed. I have reviewed the manual, but still cannot find this info. Your help is greatly appreciated. Thanks Josh Mullis From sascha at lindenlab.com Wed Nov 12 07:05:27 2008 From: sascha at lindenlab.com (Sascha Linden) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:05:27 -0800 Subject: [dsc] debianizationof the dollector Message-ID: <20081112070527.GA29745@lindenlab.com> I need the collector, but not the presenter from dsc and would like to have a debian package to standardize on. To that end, I've started the debainization of what I'm calling dsc-collector. Since I'm not an experienced debian packager, I've appealed for help through the debian bug reporting system. Here's a link to the work that I've done. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505405 Does anyone have any experience that they can apply here? -sascha From gavin.brown at centralnic.com Wed Nov 12 09:05:49 2008 From: gavin.brown at centralnic.com (Gavin Brown) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:05:49 +0000 Subject: [dsc] debianizationof the dollector In-Reply-To: <20081112070527.GA29745@lindenlab.com> References: <20081112070527.GA29745@lindenlab.com> Message-ID: <491A9C6D.6070607@centralnic.com> Hi Sascha, > I need the collector, but not the presenter from dsc and would like to > have a debian package to standardize on. To that end, I've started the > debainization of what I'm calling dsc-collector. Since I'm not an > experienced debian packager, I've appealed for help through the debian > bug reporting system. Here's a link to the work that I've done. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505405 > > Does anyone have any experience that they can apply here? We started to create RPM packages of DSC for our own use. You might find the .spec file we created useful. RPM lets you create multiple packages from a single source RPM, so you can compile once and get dsc-collector and dsc-presenter packages. Not sure of .debs can do that though. http://labs.centralnic.com/dsc.php Gavin. From andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz Wed Nov 12 20:27:47 2008 From: andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz (Andrew Ruthven) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:27:47 +1300 Subject: [dsc] debianizationof the dollector In-Reply-To: <491A9C6D.6070607@centralnic.com> References: <20081112070527.GA29745@lindenlab.com> <491A9C6D.6070607@centralnic.com> Message-ID: <1226521667.32493.3.camel@dirk.catalyst.net.nz> Hi guys, On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 09:05 +0000, Gavin Brown wrote: > We started to create RPM packages of DSC for our own use. You might find > the .spec file we created useful. RPM lets you create multiple packages > from a single source RPM, so you can compile once and get dsc-collector > and dsc-presenter packages. Not sure of .debs can do that though. Yes, multiple .debs can be created from the one debian/control file, which is what my packages do. I create dsc-collector, dsc-presenter and dsc-doc, which looking at your spec file I see is what you do! Cheers! -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand At work: andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz At home: andrew at etc.gen.nz GPG fpr: 34CA 12A3 C6F8 B156 72C2 D0D7 D286 CE0C 0C62 B791 From josh.mullis at cox.com Fri Nov 21 21:13:40 2008 From: josh.mullis at cox.com (Josh Mullis) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:13:40 -0500 Subject: [dsc] Second Level Domains In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1227302020.21027.8.camel@fedora9> So, no one has graphs that are based on website names (google.com, cnn.com, etc.)? I know it's possible... dnstop has the capability. I think it's called Tier Levels or something like that. Any ideas? Anybody? On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 12:21 -0500, Mullis, Josh (CCI-Atlanta) wrote: > > Good day, > > Is there any way to graph Second Level Domains (google.com, > facebook.com, etc...) as opposed to Top Level Domains (.com, .org, > etc...)? > > I see Second Level Domains in the xml's, but can't find a way to get > it graphed. > I have reviewed the manual, but still cannot find this info. > > > Your help is greatly appreciated. > > > Thanks > Josh Mullis > From wessels at measurement-factory.com Fri Nov 21 23:15:34 2008 From: wessels at measurement-factory.com (Duane Wessels) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:15:34 -0700 (MST) Subject: [dsc] Second Level Domains In-Reply-To: <1227302020.21027.8.camel@fedora9> References: <1227302020.21027.8.camel@fedora9> Message-ID: On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Josh Mullis wrote: > So, no one has graphs that are based on website names (google.com, > cnn.com, etc.)? > > I know it's possible... > dnstop has the capability. > I think it's called Tier Levels or something like that. Hi Josh, The capability does not currently exist in DSC, but it could be added with a little programming. How do imagine the graphs would look? Which of the current graphs would you like the second-level domain graph to look like? DW From Josh.Mullis at cox.com Sat Nov 22 02:36:28 2008 From: Josh.Mullis at cox.com (Josh.Mullis at cox.com) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:36:28 -0500 Subject: [dsc] Second Level Domains Message-ID: Thanks for the response Duane... I would imagine the graph to look like the TLD graphs, just with the second levels added to the .com, .org and so forth. As for the location, maybe adding another subgraph to the TLD menu called Second Tier would be a good place for it. Thanks again. -Josh ----- Original Message ----- From: Duane Wessels To: Mullis, Josh (CCI-Atlanta) Cc: dsc at measurement-factory.com Sent: Fri Nov 21 18:15:34 2008 Subject: Re: [dsc] Second Level Domains On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Josh Mullis wrote: > So, no one has graphs that are based on website names (google.com, > cnn.com, etc.)? > > I know it's possible... > dnstop has the capability. > I think it's called Tier Levels or something like that. Hi Josh, The capability does not currently exist in DSC, but it could be added with a little programming. How do imagine the graphs would look? Which of the current graphs would you like the second-level domain graph to look like? DW From wbeaver at afilias.info Sat Nov 22 21:42:34 2008 From: wbeaver at afilias.info (Wayne Beaver) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:42:34 -0500 Subject: [dsc] Second Level Domain In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <51FE4FED-7128-4FC5-B5C5-8DB19AA678F2@afilias.info> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Duane Wessels > To: Mullis, Josh (CCI-Atlanta) > Cc: dsc at measurement-factory.com > Sent: Fri Nov 21 18:15:34 2008 > Subject: Re: [dsc] Second Level Domains > > > > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Josh Mullis wrote: > >> So, no one has graphs that are based on website names (google.com, >> cnn.com, etc.)? >> >> I know it's possible... >> dnstop has the capability. >> I think it's called Tier Levels or something like that. > > Hi Josh, > > The capability does not currently exist in DSC, but it could > be added with a little programming. > > How do imagine the graphs would look? Which of the current > graphs would you like the second-level domain graph to > look like? +1 for second-level domanis.... For the "backshop" perspective, it would be nice to be able to define them, much as one can the TLDs, so that one could, say, collect and/or report on only second-level domains of interest, etc. wb From andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz Mon Nov 24 07:41:05 2008 From: andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz (Andrew Ruthven) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:41:05 +1300 Subject: [dsc] Second Level Domain In-Reply-To: <51FE4FED-7128-4FC5-B5C5-8DB19AA678F2@afilias.info> References: <51FE4FED-7128-4FC5-B5C5-8DB19AA678F2@afilias.info> Message-ID: <1227512465.4323.5.camel@cyclops.etc.gen.nz> On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 16:42 -0500, Wayne Beaver wrote: > +1 for second-level domanis.... > > For the "backshop" perspective, it would be nice to be able to define > them, much as one can the TLDs, so that one could, say, collect and/or > report on only second-level domains of interest, etc. As someone who uses DSC to monitor a cctld, being able to specify third-level domains of interest as well... Cheers! -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand Catalyst IT Limited --> http://www.catalyst.net.nz At work: andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz At home: andrew at etc.gen.nz GPG fpr: 34CA 12A3 C6F8 B156 72C2 D0D7 D286 CE0C 0C62 B791 From dikshie at lapi.itb.ac.id Mon Nov 24 14:16:09 2008 From: dikshie at lapi.itb.ac.id (Dikshie) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:16:09 +0700 Subject: [dsc] sql backend Message-ID: <20081124141609.GA56659@lapi.itb.ac.id> just installed, and follow instructions but i got : (cd cron; make all) (cd extractor; make all) perl -c store-incoming-data.pl Can't locate DSC/db.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at store-incoming-data.pl line 7. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at store-incoming-data.pl line 7. *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/local/src/dsc-200811141043-sql/presenter/extractor. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/src/dsc-200811141043-sql/presenter. what kind perl module that i miss? i have: -------- p5-DBD-mysql50-4.006 = up-to-date with port p5-DBI-1.60.4 = up-to-date with port p5-DBIx-Class-0.08010 = up-to-date with port p5-DBIx-ContextualFetch-1.03 = up-to-date with port p5-DBIx-Log4perl-0.13 = up-to-date with port p5-Data-Dumper-2.121 = up-to-date with port -------- regards, -dikshie- From wessels at measurement-factory.com Mon Nov 24 16:46:41 2008 From: wessels at measurement-factory.com (Duane Wessels) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:46:41 -0700 (MST) Subject: [dsc] sql backend In-Reply-To: <20081124141609.GA56659@lapi.itb.ac.id> References: <20081124141609.GA56659@lapi.itb.ac.id> Message-ID: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Dikshie wrote: > Can't locate DSC/db.pm in @INC ... > what kind perl module that i miss? You didn't miss anything. Its a stupid bug in my Makefile logic. You can get around it like this: # cd presenter/perllib # make install # cd .. # make install Meanwhile, I'm committing a fix for this to the SQL branch too. DW From wessels at measurement-factory.com Mon Nov 24 16:51:43 2008 From: wessels at measurement-factory.com (Duane Wessels) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:51:43 -0700 (MST) Subject: [dsc] sql backend In-Reply-To: References: <20081124141609.GA56659@lapi.itb.ac.id> Message-ID: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Duane Wessels wrote: > Meanwhile, I'm committing a fix for this to the SQL branch too. Actually this was already fixed in the repository which makes me think you might have an older copy of the SQL version. The latest is: http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dsc/download/dsc-200811141043-sql.tar.gz From wessels at measurement-factory.com Tue Nov 25 00:40:04 2008 From: wessels at measurement-factory.com (Duane Wessels) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:40:04 -0700 (MST) Subject: [dsc] Second Level Domain In-Reply-To: <1227512465.4323.5.camel@cyclops.etc.gen.nz> References: <51FE4FED-7128-4FC5-B5C5-8DB19AA678F2@afilias.info> <1227512465.4323.5.camel@cyclops.etc.gen.nz> Message-ID: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Andrew Ruthven wrote: > As someone who uses DSC to monitor a cctld, being able to specify > third-level domains of interest as well... Version posted today has datasets for 2nd and 3rd level domains: http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dsc/download/dsc-200811241737.tar.gz After installing, you will have to add these lines to your dsc.cfg file: dataset second_ld_vs_rcode dns Rcode:rcode SecondLD:second_ld replies-only max-cells=50; dataset third_ld_vs_rcode dns Rcode:rcode ThirdLD:third_ld replies-only max-cells=50; From wbeaver at afilias.info Tue Nov 25 19:59:21 2008 From: wbeaver at afilias.info (Wayne Beaver) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:59:21 -0500 Subject: [dsc] Second Level Domain In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <46B79D9C-F107-43D5-BBFC-7584C7862A5B@afilias.info> Any chance these new features are (or will be) included in a new version of the db-backed beta version of DSC, as well? wb > Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:40:04 -0700 (MST) > From: Duane Wessels > Subject: Re: [dsc] Second Level Domain > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Andrew Ruthven wrote: > >> As someone who uses DSC to monitor a cctld, being able to specify >> third-level domains of interest as well... > > Version posted today has datasets for 2nd and 3rd level domains: > > http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dsc/download/dsc-200811241737.tar.gz > > After installing, you will have to add these lines to your dsc.cfg > file: > > dataset second_ld_vs_rcode dns Rcode:rcode SecondLD:second_ld > replies-only max-cells=50; > dataset third_ld_vs_rcode dns Rcode:rcode ThirdLD:third_ld replies- > only max-cells=50; From wessels at measurement-factory.com Tue Nov 25 20:20:18 2008 From: wessels at measurement-factory.com (Duane Wessels) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:20:18 -0700 (MST) Subject: [dsc] Second Level Domain In-Reply-To: <46B79D9C-F107-43D5-BBFC-7584C7862A5B@afilias.info> References: <46B79D9C-F107-43D5-BBFC-7584C7862A5B@afilias.info> Message-ID: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Wayne Beaver wrote: > Any chance these new features are (or will be) included in a new version of > the db-backed beta version of DSC, as well? yes, I merged them there but just didn't make a sql tarball. will do it now... http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dsc/download/dsc-200811251319-sql.tar.gz